Index
A preventive routine may depend on time, hours of use or equipment events. The system needs to represent these triggers and explain why an intervention was created.
How to evaluate this decision
Separate plan, occurrence and execution. Changing the plan should not erase services already provided. Delayed or corrected usage readings may change the forecast, so record origin and timing of measurement. The technical definition of interventions belongs to those responsible for maintenance; the software organizes the schedule and execution evidence.
Criteria for comparing proposals
- Scheduling: combine periodicity, availability and priority without generating duplicate orders for the same event.
- Execution: record activities, materials, impediments and approval when necessary.
- History: preserve review of the plan and reason for postponement, cancellation or anticipation.
A scenario to discuss with the supplier
Hypothetical example: a machine reaches the limit of hours before the scheduled date. The rule must anticipate the pending issue according to the validated plan, without confusing prediction with completed intervention.
What to validate upon delivery
Test corrected reading, equipment unavailable and service partially executed. Check if the next cycle uses the correct reference and if the history allows you to understand the calculation.
Prepare the conversation about the project
Inform Quantum9 of existing equipment, triggers, responsible parties and systems. The project can start by programming a family of assets, with integration and technical criteria delimited by the operation.
Tailor-made systems · Map the company's priority