Context and work plan
Reading the repository, business rules and dependencies to define tasks and acceptance criteria.
Combine AI and engineering agents to analyze, implement, test, and evolve software with human review and acceptance criteria.
A scope built from your process, with deliverables that the team can validate and use.
Reading the repository, business rules and dependencies to define tasks and acceptance criteria.
Agents support code changes, integrations and documentation in delimited tasks, under engineering coordination.
Relevant testing, change analysis, and human review before integrating or publishing a deliverable.
Versioned changes, recording of decisions and transferring the context to the client's team.
Illustrative example of application; does not represent a measured customer outcome.
An integration waits in the backlog: it requires understanding the legacy, changing contracts and validating failure scenarios.
Engineering divides work into tasks; Agents support analysis, code, and testing. Changes undergo review, approval and approval before publication.
We start with a diagnosis and a pilot cycle on a real section of the backlog. Continuity combines engineering, agents, and review into prioritized cycles compared to the project baseline.
Agentic AI does not eliminate the need for engineering, review, or testing. Gains vary depending on the system and are measured in the pilot. Access to environments, use of providers and approval of publications are defined with the client.
It is the use of agents capable of performing steps of a task with tools and context: analyzing files, proposing changes, implementing and executing checks. In our delivery, this work is delimited and supervised by engineering.
The work connects to the repository, project rules, and delivery checks. The result is a reviewable software change, with acceptance criteria, and not just a code suggestion.
We do not promise a universal percentage. We measure cycle time, cost, rework and quality in the pilot to decide where the use of agents generates value.
Yes, subject to analysis of architecture, access and test conditions. Action can begin with maintenance, integration or a limited functionality, without requiring rewriting of the system.
Engineering reviews the changes and the customer participates in acceptance. Permissions, permitted data and tools are agreed before use; publication follows the project approval flow.
Tell us which process needs to be improved, the systems involved and the company’s current situation. We will analyze the context and respond via email.
Service of interest: Development with agentic AI. After the initial analysis, we decide whether the next step is a diagnosis, a pilot or a proposal.
Discover our projects