The portal must connect sample, specification revision and accepted points while separating appearance approval from series release.
Index
A visually accepted sample may not represent every production requirement; the decision must identify the specification actually checked.
The rule that changes the scope
The portal must connect sample, specification revision and accepted points while separating appearance approval from series release.
A file library stores evidence; a custom module organizes requirement-level evaluation and customer responses.
A customer may accept conditionally, requesting one point be confirmed before series production. That state must differ from full approval and rejection. A revised specification can leave many requirements valid, so request identification of points actually needing reevaluation. The portal retains evidence and organizes decisions; it must not claim product compliance with standards or certifications not checked by the responsible team within the agreed assessment scope. An appearance-only decision should therefore remain visibly narrower than complete manufacturing authorization.
Specify operational deliverables
- Associate each sample with the requirements and revision actually used.
- Show approved, conditional and still unevaluated customer requirements.
- Keep specification changes after acceptance and the points requiring another sample.
Test the exception before acceptance
In a hypothetical scenario, the customer accepts appearance but requests a dimensional change; production must see that complete release remains pending.
Reference for assessing scope
NN/g: writing task scenarios for usability testing
Prepare your project with Quantum9
Bring a sample, its specification and the criteria used to authorize series production.