Index
Searching for contracts with AI requires finding the correct version and respecting who can view each document. A fluent answer does not replace the reference that allows you to verify the information.
How to evaluate this decision
Organize the contract, amendments and validity status according to the registration validated by the company. The search needs to consider the applicable set, without mixing conditions from different customers. Require explicit source indication and behavior when there is insufficient evidence. The assistant can support localization and summarization, but must not undertake legal interpretation or make contractual decisions autonomously.
Criteria for comparing proposals
- Collection: relate versions and additives with identifiers and responsible parties.
- Access: apply permissions to retrieve documents and present responses.
- Answer: quote excerpts and distinguish information found from inference or absence of data.
A scenario to discuss with the supplier
Hypothetical example: the original contract provides for a condition amended by amendment. The wizard should retrieve the relevant update and allow you to check both documents, rather than responding with just the first file found.
What to validate upon delivery
Test questions with additives, similar documents and users with different access. Include unanswered questions to verify that the tool recognizes the limitation.
Prepare the conversation about the project
Quantum9 can implement assisted search with fonts and access control. Bring the authorized collection, its organization and the operational questions that the team needs to answer.
AI for processes · Map the company's priority